Through an increase in the knowledge base surrounding marijuana, the substantial economical and medical benefits, and lack of significant drawbacks, support the notion of reformation in current marijuana legislation. This reform would restrict consumption in any instances that endangered the wellbeing of any individuals, but would still defend the basic freedoms that are part of this country. America was structured in a way that protected its citizens against oppressive laws and inhibition of liberties, yet we still have legislation in place that prohibits americans from right to express their personal freedoms.
Still, one might argue that the preexisting legality of other more harmful substances does not serve as valid justification to legalize cannabis use, but in fact, marijuana can actually prove beneficial in certain areas. In the health field, for example, cannabis can be used as a muscle relaxer, which helps in treatments of Multiple Sclerosis, seizures, and Tourette's Syndrome. The appetite boosting effects also prove promising in use with cancer patients who are struggling to eat. Further, THC, the active ingredient of marijuana, blocks deposits in the brain that cause Alzheimer’s Disease.
So, if cannabis will continue to be used regardless of whether it is legal or not, it would make sense to provide it in a safe, controlled manner. By distributing the substance from government sanctioned dispensaries, the product could be properly regulated, so consumers know exactly what they are purchasing. This would also eliminate interactions with criminal drug dealers, and any hazards that accompany nefarious activities. In addition to increased safety, dispensaries would also present the opportunity to enact a tax on the sale of marijuana. As a widely used product, the financial potential behind this could prove immensely beneficial to our troubled economy. Similar to the current state and federal taxes on alcohol and tobacco, such excised good can generate a significant increase in revenue. This additional income could be used any number of areas in society that could use extra income. In the example of Amendment 64 in Colorado, tax revenues would go towards programs involving substance abuse prevention and research, increased funding for the public education system, and more widely accessible healthcare. The economical benefits go beyond simply generating more income, as they would allow us to save money as well. Currently, a substantial amount of tax payer’s dollars are going to pay for inmates jailed on petty cannabis charges. These individuals pose little actual threat to society, yet are expensive to keep in correctional facilities. Furthermore, their absence would free up spaces in overcrowded prisons, allowing room for more dangerous or threatening criminals.
Yearly Arrests Related to Marijuana
This is a great blog, but you are throwing out a lot of facts out there and all we can do is hoping that they are facts. You should include a lot more in text links when you mention things such as the colorado amendment and your 40%,20% statistic about how quickly random little kids said they could obtain marijuana.
ReplyDeleteIan, you blog is really great, however some readers might not feel the same way because the information is not supported. There are no hyperlinks that show where you got your statistics from so it seems like the article may be biased.
ReplyDeleteCould put a video on how marijuana is not necesarily a gateway drug http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9-xOTsIhZk
This is a good blog. The argument was very nicely laid out. However, when you stated, “Marijuana, on the other hand, is less harmful than both these substances (alcohol and tobacco), yet is completely federally prohibited”---that is false. Marijuana is actually more dangerous than alcohol and tobacco and has much more direct and swift effects. Watch this video for further explanation form 3:35 to 11:30: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0IzYFHTGho. With that said, should marijuana be decriminalized if its more dangerous than both alcohol and tobacco. Isn’t the federal government doing the right thing by keeping this poison off the streets. The government wouldn’t crack or heroin. What makes marijuana any different. Check out this study from Yale University about marijuana as a gateway drug for further explanation: http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Yale-study-Marijuana-may-really-be-gateway-drug-3805532.php.
ReplyDeleteThis is a detailed, thorough blog and for that it must be credited, but at points the reader is left feeling confused because there are too many wordy explanations. The wordy explanations take away from the information you are trying to relay so instead of describing the details show the reader and it will be much more effective. Under your 5th section I see “As a widely used product, the financial potential behind this could prove immensely beneficial to our troubled economy.” Here you should show the reader these benefits as your example, “Amendment 64 in Colorado, tax revenues would go towards programs involving substance abuse prevention and research, increased funding for the public education system, and more widely accessible healthcare” is a long example for your reader to understand whereas http://www.regulatemarijuana.org/sites/default/files/potentialbenefits.jpg could give your reader a better understanding.
ReplyDeleteJust first sentence -
ReplyDelete“Through use in a safe and responsible manner, the recreational and medical use of marijuana holds many potentially beneficial effects on today’s society.”
- http://unit2debate.blogspot.com/ first paragraph
Over define marijuana use….. Beneficial effects aren’t defined….. Sentence is pointless. The rest of the paragraph is hard to compare back to and it is so hard to understand. I have no clue whether you’re for or against or for marijuana. After first paragraph I would have left the site, but Hammer made us stay so you’re lucky.
Paragraph 2
Prescription drugs can also do the same thing marijuana does and prescriptions are much easier to regulate. Plus your basis of Alzheimer’s has no viable scholarly backing.
• Your road map goes from health effects to students acquiring drugs… (no direct causation)
“While it may be true on some levels that marijuana can act as a “gateway drug”, the fact remains the legality, or lack thereof, has little to no effect on the drug’s popularity or availability among many places in society. One study shows that, among American teenagers, 40% said they could obtain marijuana within a day, and 25% said they could acquire it in under an hour. The survey went on to provide data showing that, in "teens between the ages of 12 and 17 say it's easier to get marijuana than buy cigarettes, beer, or prescription drugs"
- http://unit2debate.blogspot.com/ third paragraph a.k.a. WTF paragraph
What effect does this have on legalizing, it just shows how easy it is to get. No benefits to why we should legalize it. All are completely pointless facts.
I like 4th paragraph…. but still so long and boring.
Actual medical marijuana talk, from and MD:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHBsxfbgrbY&NR=1&feature=endscreenPrescription
Your blog post made me so bored at one point, reading just became boring, so I started to look at background and stare. There are so many points in your roadmap that they are just a long way to a less than well-defined point, it’s a non- linear trajectory. You make so many jumps in logic like “In these specific practices of cannabis use, consumption would be restricted in any instances that endangered the wellbeing of any individuals. America was structured in a way that protected its citizens against oppressive laws and inhibition of liberties, yet we still have legislation in place that prohibits Americans from right to express their personal freedoms.” That caused by this huge road map, readers won’t want to read. Overall your blog wasn’t enjoyable and I was more interested with the videos in your sidebar, which isn’t good because I left your site multiple times.
From your friends at: hammersweedwar.blogspot.com
First off, never start with a biased beginning. You go right into the benefits of marijuana. You have very good facts, and some great evidence to go along with the charts and videos you have displayed. You should have a little more resources that contain a URL which you can just go to the website and read it. This would get the reader a chance to go off your blog and see some research from a different point of view. It is a very lengthy blog; you should be a lot more concise with what you are trying to prove.
ReplyDeleteFirst allow me to comment on just how ironic is your idea of funding a drug prevention program ("Amendment 64 in Colorado") through tax money from marijuana is. Second, you think having the government sell and tax marijuana will "eliminate interactions with criminal drug dealers"? Taxing something means its more expensive, hence giving people incentives to do underground trading. The underground trade will then lead to a stronger the black market and possibly "more" organized crime.
ReplyDeletePT, Amendment 64 creates funding for substance abuse prevention programs, meaning helping to deter the use of powerful, more addictive drugs like cocaine or heroin, in addition to others. It is also important to note the distinction between substance "abuse" and "abstinence". In the same way that many individuals can enjoy an occasional drink without necessarily "abusing" the substance, the same can be said for marijuana in this sense.
DeleteAlso, just because something is taxed does not mean it promotes illegal trading. Look at tobacco. Look at alcohol. Do you suppose there is heavy "underground trafficking" of cigarettes? The answer is no, there is not, because they are legal. Government regulation and taxation will not "lead to a stronger black market", it will create a more reliable, available product. Due to the appeal of a better product, as well as the benefit of not breaking the law, consumers will be more drawn to government sanctioned dispensaries rather than any sort of illicit sources. Consequently, interactions with criminal drug dealers would decrease substantially.
For more information on this idea, look at the crime rates during the Alcohol Prohibition of 1919. Crime rates soared during this time, and plunged almost immediately after it was repealed and made legal again. This website can offer additional facts on this phenomenon: http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/library/graphs/29.htm
Considering the fact that Marijuana is a gateway drug for more "powerful, more addictive drugs like cocaine or heroin", the idea of using tax money from legal sale of marijuana to fund Amendment 64 is just contradicting. Its basically like selling tools to woodcutting industry and using that money on deforestation prevention.
Delete